[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: fanva lo nuzba
- To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: fanva lo nuzba
- From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:50:21 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Id2W+FjhZkU2U9OUQDy13wHkX/aEuOYTI60UFN3RdXZDUvRe2jFsgylf9lcf01CBQn5WlEU9djr3aTCz/pR/EOYktnDHSEPtfPnoioWagykAzItApPRRrsWYXoPyUtuWLRc7s2Y+CiIOpzZ0lnCDbyCMolKmuKb+0c3phOB6cpE=
- In-reply-to: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C88D@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- References: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C88D@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
la filip cu cusku di'ela .komfo,amonan. cu cusku di'e
> se cusku la petr bratn po lo briju po lo ralca'i po la sualbard
I wonder whether it wouldn't have been more Lojbanic to use {be} rather than {po}
In this case, it could probably have been {la petr bratn po lo briju be lo ralca'i be la sualbard}.
iecai