[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: Another Newbie Intro
- To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Another Newbie Intro
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:29:34 -0300
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Jv1mEX9Fc181ohkj5U1ZhikxhuLfEuivhnbCsEV0zo4gZrHfdTl5OKP0Uc6SzlziVreGxlZFS47IasONMC476OdJuvIX7yCw6gqDPK66vgcEM9Ca33EknRZqSbIl8cF9SkC2/ifOssjzWBe9yFNv7TyIJKRIIM2J9k3kizkl0qw=
- In-reply-to: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C8AC@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- References: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C8AC@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Yes - .e connects sumti, so you could say {coi la nei,omis .e rodo} but not
{coi la nei,omis .e coi rodo} since {coi rodo} is not a sumti.
I would've left out {la} after COI and would've said {coi .nei,omis. .e rodo
.i mi'e .skat.}, but leaving in the {la} is not wrong.
Actually, in this case you do need the {la}, for the same
reason you give above. {neiomis} by itself is not a sumti.
mu'o mi'e xorxes