[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: three-letter gismu?



When I decided to learn a constructed language, I had to come to grips with the fact that none would ever meet my standards. None will ever meet yours either, and you are wise to recognize this. You have to decide what level you can accept. My ultimate decision was made based on the fact that Lojban is overwhelmingly closer to my desires than anything else out there. Most languages don't even make an attempt to accomplish these goals. I then made a conscious choice to accept things like this.
-epkat

On 9/7/05, HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com> wrote:
doi .filip.
> And I think that the Angles got their name because they came from an
> angle-shaped piece of land.
That's possible... anyway, thanks!
 
la maikyl. pu ciska di'e .u'i
> After looking through the Lojbanic dictionary, I'm pretty certain that a
> lot of words can be trimmed. E.g:
> mamta -> nimrir
> patfu -> naurir
> verba -> selrir
> Infact, I can't believe there are gismu for some of the words. I would,
> for example (running finger down page) never had made "vinji"-airplane.
> Wouldn't varma'e be better? It is only one letter longer and saves
> people needing to learn that extra gismu.
Um... yeah. Not long after signing up to this list to this list I came to the same idea
only with {catlu}, {zgana} and - which I thought would replace both of them - {viska}.
Firstly, I agree with You that words like 'airplane' are very unnecessary, but what
hurts my feelings really is the arbitrary of these expressions. With some of them in,
some of them out the word-set of Lojban is a bit messy.
Secondly: for me those gismu (referring the parents, for example) hold and transmit
a lot more emotions than lujvo derived from root words.
And at last: there is no point looking to the past indeed. .uinai The vocabulary stays
what it is, with all its arbitrary and somewhat foolish choices.

mi'e .xili,odor.