[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: Difficulties and frustrations
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Difficulties and frustrations
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:39:02 -0300
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k/KI+1WdYavm7A5bUs9M//nNyP4OnF49VV/hg2qchLK63gheY8T9fpoe4CnCrxaDO4rdnQrPtLDk1LQ+QMNxjXhsjs61NiFpOXwiZoZLG9dW3iC0oXbUsppppRA8drzsfdWITbb7kZ/7Ntpp+O9XcEcg6TyRmDt6C2FHyGVsk14=
- In-reply-to: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C96E@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- References: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C96E@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 11/1/05, Newton, Philip <Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de> wrote:
> I believe those three ended up with three rafsi each because of prior usage
> of each of the three possible rafsi, or something like that.
>
> Does someone know the story better? xorxes? camgusmis?
Neither of us was around at the time, but if I had to guess, I'd say
it was found that no other gismu could have those forms as rafsi
and so they were assigned to them rather than leave them
unassigned.
mu'o mi'e xorxes