[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: Black holes; are not they

To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Black holes; are not they
From: Jessica <j.shewellbrockway@virgin.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 15:00:01 +0000
In-reply-to: <2d3df92a0511050628x3404d007k3404853f23257936@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2d3df92a0511050628x3404d007k3404853f23257936@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051011)

Black holes are xekri, but they are not kevna. Use of a gismu impliesthat all of its places exist:


kevna: x1 is a cavity/hole/hollow/cavern in x2

To be a kevna, a thing has to be a hole /in something/.

fe'omi'e JEsikas.

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban-beginners] Re: Black holes; are not they
  - From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>

References:
- [lojban-beginners] Black holes; are not they
  - From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [lojban-beginners] Black holes; are not they
Next by Date: [lojban-beginners] Re: Black holes; are not they
Previous by thread: [lojban-beginners] Black holes; are not they
Next by thread: [lojban-beginners] Re: Black holes; are not they
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread