[lojban-beginners] Re: lunra

To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lunra
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:17:11 +0100
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=f0yYnQZ0ZaieXHjB7dVRf7A1W00l33eJ4ex5WAEEWJgsHeXZ1TtiyGnzPdqhiqEH+sItd0rnFpDs/a34eecZr75GfTNaESqOzbVcBWZ6HB5mS5/DXcOgUTKovwHh45lbfYnKm6TbRD2KkOlC4cHsKS56Kp12OgF3icSDSt7AKkU=
In-reply-to: <28214402.20051221205548@mail.ru>
References: <28214402.20051221205548@mail.ru>
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org

I suspect {le lunra} would be incorrect, in spite of the traditional malglico
equations "a = lo; the = le".

Indeed it sounds bad.

The question is, how to underline the fact that {lunra} is unique?

{la terdi}, {la solri}, ... {la lunra}.

mi'e darves.

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban-beginners] Re: lunra
  - From: Sunnan <sunnan@handgranat.org>
- [lojban-beginners] First steps
  - From: Marcelo Coelho Albernaz <marcelo@coelho.ath.cx>

References:
- [lojban-beginners] lunra
  - From: Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru>