Chris Capel wrote: > On 8/16/06, Timo Paulssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: >> it is capable to understand stuff like pa re ci, pareci or p a r e c i. > > If I understand correctly, that last isn't valid lojban. > > Chris Capel you're right! i heard on the lojban irc channel that it should be accepting stuff like that. fixing that now. i got a weird bug that lets it think 1.111[...] != 1.111[...] :/ (pano fi'u so or something near that) going to look into that as well ki'e mu'o mi'e timos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature