[lojban-beginners] Re: A learning idea..... and my own attempt to do it.

[Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com>]

On 11/30/06, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > zi lo jeftu be li re mi [pu] co'a pidversra lo mi bimoi be lo'i verba
> > be'o ne lo se natmrfilipino ke cmalu. nixli poi xabju lo tcadu pe me'e
> > la'o py. Manila .py.
>
> {la'o py. Manila .py} is the city, not the name of the city:
> {lo tcadu po'u la'o py. Manila .py}
>
> {zoi py. Manila .py} would be the name.

I prefer {lo tcadu po'u la'o py. Manila .py}

> > So there is no type 4 fu'ivla for "Filipino". I think there should be
> > one.
>
> {filpino} or {pilpino} would work.

Nice. I prefer {pilpino}. I assume that this fu'ivla would take the
same place structure as any cultural gismu suck as glico:

glico x1 is English/pertains to English-speaking culture in aspect x2

so then:

pilpino x1 is Pilipino/pertains to Pilipino-speaking culture in aspect x2

So then this would result on:

zi lo jeftu be li re mi [pu] co'a pidversra lo mi bimoi be lo'i verba
be'o ne lo pilpino ke cmalu. nixli poi xabju lo tcadu po'u la'o py.
Manila .py

Anything wrong?