[lojban-beginners] Re: pu'i?

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 12/29/06, alexjm@umich.edu <alexjm@umich.edu> wrote:
> I can see som ambiguity if you have {pu'ibroda} -- can this break into
> both {pu'i broda} and be an alternate for {pujbroda}? Or would we need
> {pu'irbroda} for the second meaning?

Yes, you need the {r}, precisely to avoid that ambiguity. Initial and
unstressed CVV rafsi must always be glued with an -r- (or -n-, when -r-
is not possible) .

mu'o mi'e xorxes