[lojban-beginners] Re: POM: the Princess puts her foot down

["Turniansky, Michael" <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com>]

Would "mi viska le cukta be fa naku" effectively the same meaning as "mi na viska le cukta"?  Or is it more ill-defined?

I didn't realize that nu broda was a selbri.  Fascinating.  So I could say things like "la UAtrlus nu la naPOleon jamna terji'a"?  Cool.

              --gejyspa


-----Original Message-----
From: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org] On Behalf Of Pierre Abbat
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:01 PM
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: POM: the Princess puts her foot down

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 13:52, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> A simple bridi consists of a selbri and any number of terms:
>
>   [term] [term] ... [selbri] [term] [term] ...
>
> A term can be a simple sumti, like {mi}, {ko'a}, {le mlatu}, {la djan},
> {lo nu mi klama le zarci}, etc. or a _tagged_ sumti, like
> {fa mi}, {ki'u ko'a}, {ca lo nu mi klama le zarci}, etc.
>
> There are many types of tags, the members of PU are among them.

{naku} is also a term, but not a sumti, yielding weird sentences such as {mi 
viska le cukta be fa naku}.

phma