|
Yes, I sorry. I did in fact mean le
broda cu brodi le brodi fe le brodo… all those brod* got me confused and I lost
track of what I was doing ;-) --gejyspa From:
lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org] On Behalf Of komfo,amonan From: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
[mailto:
lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org] On
Behalf Of Turniansky, Michael 1)
I note that just as lojban disallows certain CC combinations (such as
"mz") for fear they will be misheard, TLI Loglan disallows certain
triples (like "ndj" which might be confused as "nj")
Does lojban have any such forbidden triples? I see none such in the CRG,
but don't know if the BPFK has done anything on this. 2)
An utterance of the form "le broda cu le brode fe le brodi" or even
"le broda cu fe le brode fe le brodi" is grammatically acceptable,
but does it have any meaning? As I see it, there are three
possibilities: One) it is non-meaningful, and clearly and error; two) It
implies some type of logical or non-logical connection between the
argument, equivalent to "le broda cu fe brode JE/JOI brodi"
(and probably specifically je or joi); or three) brodi replaces brode
entirely. Has this been discussed/resolved?
Thanks in advance,
--gejsypa On 2/26/07, Turniansky,
Michael <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com>
wrote: 1)
there are four explicitly disallowed triples --
ndj'', ``ndz'', ``ntc'', and ``nts" (CLL, chapter 3, just above last
paragraph of section 7) 2)
It is my second guess. It operates like
".e" , simultaneously making the claim about both items in that slot
(CLL chapter 9, example 3.9)
--gejyspa, sevzi tavla
|