[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #002



Thanks for the suggestion.  I will use jbfi'e.  However please bear in mind that for a non-linguist non-mathematician etc etc, jbofi'e output can sometimes be difficult or impossible to interpret.
 
mu'o ni'e .andrus.

----- Original Message ----
From: "komfo,amonan" <komfoamonan@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:54:45 AM
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #002

On 4/23/07, Turniansky, Michael <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com> wrote:

  Komfo:

I would suggest running every composition through jboski or jbofi'e. When I was a beginner, a few months of doing that completely cured me of "rookie" mistakes like missing {cu}, dropping abstractions, & the like.
mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

         If that was addressed to me, komfo,amonan, I usually do.  I was particularly rushed on Friday, to get home.  (As far as the rest goes, I wanted to change Andrew's existing words as little as possible)

It was addressed to Andrew. jbofi'e was hugely beneficial to me in my newbitude, and I just wanted to pass that along.

mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan