[lojban-beginners] Re: BPFK Taskmaster

[ANDREW PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com>]

I understand.  But please note, Matt, anybody reading the page on standards and compliance  http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Official+Baseline+Statement&bl  would understand that at least some of the texts are reviewed for compliance - otherwise why have it there?  Your explanation of the actual situation in your e-mail below is clear...but it's not on the baseline page nor on the page listing the texts.  If it were, then I wouldn't be wasting your time on this. 

mu'o mi'e .andrus.


----- Original Message ----
From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 9:35:05 AM
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: BPFK Taskmaster


But as Robin just said, there currently is no process and we aren't
ready yet to institute one. He said that we first must finish
clarifying the precise meanings and edge use cases of the rarest
cmavo, so that we will be able to verify their usage. We must complete
work on the standard before we can know if a text with weird usages is
conforming to the more esoteric areas of the standard.

However, we all now agree that it is within the BPFK's mandate and
purview to put this on their to-do list.

-Matt


On 5/26/07, m.kornig@sondal.net <m.kornig@sondal.net> wrote:
> I totally agree.
>
> Selon ANDREW PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com>:
>
> > .. texts .. reviewed or
> > declared compliant by the committee.  If some have, then they should be
> > declared as such.  Beginners will feel more comfortable knowing that the text
> > they are studying has gone through the process.
>
>
>
>