And once I have learnt some more, may be in a year or
so, I expect to meet up with some of you to see
whether it really works, and whether the words
(and the grammar) I've learnt are really useful...
Maybe this explains the different views we seem
to have on "useful" words to learn for beginners?
I'd distinguish between "general usefulness" and "personal usefulness". I understand your view which sees words like "dog" to be basic. It might depend on people's perspectives, though. It's ideological to think that the basic & useful concepts of animal in this world are decisively "dog", "cat", and "mouse". Why not simply "animal" (
danlu) as a more elementary concept? Also I think you can omit "boy" and "girl" if you mind the number of items in the list, since beginners may acceptably express those concepts as "little man" (
cmalu nanmu) and "little woman" (cmalu ninmu), respectively. If you list "room" (kumfa
) you can omit "lounge" (zutku'a) and "kitchen" (jupku'a) since expressions like { barda kumfa } and { jukpa kumfa
} as respective alternatives of "lounge" and "kitchen" are understandable ({ barda } and { jukpa } ars already on your list, right?).
Actually I was planning myself to make something like yours in Polish, Turkish, Swahili, Chinese, and Japanese. But I haven't started anything for it. Simply because I know I haven't yet got
clear perspective of Lojban to rightly tell of its essences.