On 6/2/07, Vid Sintef <picos.picos@gmail.com> wrote:
In the exercise there's this sentence
{ le ka ce'u simsa la arnold.cfartseneger. kei poi ckaji mi }
and I wonder why it isn't like
{ le ka ce'u simsa la arnold.cfartseneger. kei poi se ckaji mi }.
The holder of the property (le ka ...) is {mi}, so it can't be the x2 of
{ckaji}, can it?
You're right, it's a mistake, the {se} should be there.
mu'o mi'e xorxes