[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: mo'i ni'a
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: mo'i ni'a
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:42:17 -0300
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l+5nVJFisKakL6NrYUQTs5lPkQ6RcAggPk5Wg4y0VGFtNoxooNHFxMcwFG5uD7+5Av2fLpdvzquGfJiBn3aWhQONEwIbwbQrhRMQIU6R/UQl13hq+59CE5C+4yAxbsmEyc234Rauh07YjG5rcshURscbFFqBKUBVZkHE6Anr8/o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sM5ctPIuRFyqf4EFeQcWXaTHArhQDRbbPD/gHX+uRAbP+Y38KZvcH+RDuCouQw/pO578EGQxIw2u3hp9IVYKcQ0ElqIx4f0YBYUUosASIKHZ90QTO6MQX7oQtBMjZ2ugenNT9aTcsSDFvLSo3XS4P+Q+ucCeXV89OlmdjY2ZUjo=
- In-reply-to: <2f91285f0707290519m55c6905ah48064182a69003e7@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <2f91285f0707290519m55c6905ah48064182a69003e7@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 7/29/07, Vid Sintef <picos.picos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> as he descended the hill, a sadness came upon him
> mo'i ni'a lo nu badri cu cfari
> Isn't a
> terminator like { ku } needed here after that pair of tenses so that a
> grammatical room for the elided sumti { le cmana } "the hill" is
> preserved instead of being overlapped with { lo nu badri }?
Yes.
> Since this instance of { mo'i ni'a } is directly followed by the sumti
> { lo nu badri } and therefore identical to the structure of { mo'i
> ti'a le barja }, I tend to read it as something like "as he went under
> the state of sadness, [something unspecified] began".
But where does the "he" that goes under the state of sadness
comes from? It's the beginning of the something unspecified that
would be moving under that state.
I don't remember ever seeing any convincing use of {mo'i} yet.
With selbri that indicate movement, it is not needed, and with
selbri that don't indicate movement, such as {cfari}, it normally
makes little or no sense.
I suggest something like:
ko'a ca lo nu nitcpare le cmana cu co'a lifri lo nu badri
mu'o mi'e xorxes