[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban-beginners] Re: Standards and states
- To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Standards and states
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:02:31 -0300
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Zzg146bEsAR7Xp/eL42mjH6qyVKRt14vuR6aPMQ2eKvTmfk6smAGalmKH2wE2ST2cO5hVd2UocB0dlGS8zLt2jNG4fM6cAVfbZIJAc5lgUVNf2gufYelBCvpcwEfazGQAZzqmYDIRO1lJVPZS0xY+n0fg6HOtwuUdGndqXn7ozc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AAqT9T2ROG2RU3OsC3muo8dI11nKhDIf8SQ35bWKykPjNNVrkuP3IYcz3J2ri9EPZTM/RqUpRZjf0K3m/tgG30qvLFMMtdKnj6BZ1R4HRPTQE1xBDEjECWNtI0KkysNvVcSUVIYH8EGlnZmP9TFvh47981jMf1KK6U7lU7gUsSs=
- In-reply-to: <891449.11497.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- References: <891449.11497.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
On 8/14/07, ANDREW PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> {.i pycy cusku lu .ieru'e .oiru'e ku'i by puza klama ti gi'e cusku lu lo melbi ba'e cmalu u'i bo guzmrkukurbita bo purdi cu se ponse do doi paf li'u li'u
>
> .i lu do'i jetnu jufra .i sa'e do'i jetnu lo za'i karbi fi le so'i guzme purdi pe by li'u se cusku ko'e}
>
> The last sentence was originally: 'Especially compared to his his fields of pumpkins.
>
> The X2 in {jetnu} should be a standard/epistemology/metaphysics. Can the {lo za'i} abstraction be used here as the standard of comparison?
I'm not very clear on what is meant to go in the x2 of jetnu, but perhaps
{.i sa'e cmalu fi le so'i guzme purdi pe by} would have done. (That also
solves the problem that {do'i} is being used to refer to an utterance
inside a quotation, which is not its normal use.)
It's also not very clear to me why a comparison would be a state. I would have
said it was an achievement, eventually a process, perhaps it could even be an
activity, but a state is the last event-type I would classify it as.
mu'o mi'e xorxes