[lojban-beginners] Re: An interesting sentence

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Monday 20 August 2007 15:08, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On 8/20/07, turnip <turnip@bcpl.net> wrote:
> > The meaning of the
> > second sentence, though, depends on whether it's English or lojban
>
> To be grammatical lojban it needs to be {la.under} though. {launder} is
> a cmevla, and can't follow {.i} directly.

That reminds me of a sign I've seen in town: "La Vanderia".

Pierre