[lojban-beginners] Re: cu'e

["Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On 8/21/07, Vid Sintef <picos.picos@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is
> {do bacu'e cliva}
> possible by way of questioning which temporal distance (zi/za/zu) is true?

I suppose, although the grammar of {cu'e} is not the same as that
of ZA. I don't think {cu'e} is a very useful word.

> How can I avoid the ambiguity between distance and interval which are
> altogether covered by {cu'e}?

I suggest {do ba cliva za ma}, {do ba cliva ze'a ma}, although the last
meaning seems much more unlikely.

mu'o mi'e xorxes