[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lojban brochure
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 18:02, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 02:24:45PM +0100, John Leuner wrote:
> [...]
> > I don't think it's a good idea to compare Lojban to a computer
> > programming language in the brochure.
>
> FWIW, I think this comparison is a good idea. The proficency of
> humans with computer programming languages is important for lojban
> because it suggests that the LALR(1)-ness of the lojban grammar
> shouldn't make it more difficult for humans than natural languages.
> Additionally this comparison certainly targets the core potential
> lojban audience, which seems to be people interested in either
> languages, computers, or both.
I would prefer "a potential core audience" to "the core potential
audience".
Why would people not interested in computers not form a potential
audience?
John Leuner
- References:
- New Members, Board of Directors, other LogFest results
- From: Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: New Members, Board of Directors, other LogFest results
- From: "jfkominek" <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
- Re: [lojban] Re: New Members, Board of Directors, other LogFest results
- From: Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language Group <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] Re: New Members, Board of Directors, other LogFest results
- From: Jay F Kominek <jkominek@miranda.org>
- Re: [lojban] Re: New Members, Board of Directors, other LogFest results
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <mark@kli.org>
- lojban brochure
- From: John Leuner <jewel@pixie.co.za>
- Re: lojban brochure
- From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>