[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] .uanai ne'i le velcli



On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:14:47AM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 8/19/2002 5:49:13 AM Central Daylight Time, 
> lojban-out@lojban.org writes:
[...]
> The question is, first, whether one is here *expressing* an obligation or 
> merely *reporting* that one has (or had) one.  I think that {ei} only 
> expresses and that this case is too deeply buried to be an expression, hence 
> the need to state the obligation openly.  Secondly, the question is whether 
[...]

I had this same argument with xorxes already on jboste (bau la
lojban. though so it wasn't quite this lame).  Check CLL chapter
2, he's right -- certain attitudinals modify the meaning of the
bridi instead of just expressing how you feel.  ".ei" is one of the
former.

-- 
Jordan DeLong
fracture@allusion.net

Attachment: pgp00020.pgp
Description: PGP signature