<<
> Having a delusion is coverd by the usually safe {mi viska li'i>>
> sincrboa}
Is that {mi viska se li'i (zo'e) sincrboa}? -- Which is okay,
though it'd be nice to be able to do it without resorting to
tanru. Or is it {mi viska lo li'i sincrboa}? -- Which would mean
seeing an experience -- not really what is wanted.
Oops! I see that someone has tinkered yet again with an unbroken concept to make a useless one (we all know where to find {lifri}, which to add insult to injusry uses {li'i} phrases as an object). I was thinking of the good old day when this idea first went round and it stood in the same relation to expreiences as {nu} does to events and so {viska lo li'i} made prefect sense, as good, anyhow, as {lifri lo nu}.
Sorry to see the old way go; especially since nothing was gained.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.