In a message dated 9/16/2002 8:16:10 PM Central Daylight Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes: << >> As a member of the generation that uses this like: >> Muffy Siegel at Temple U claims to ahve isolated three usages: 1) The quotation introduction mentioned above 2) a hedge -- what follows is not guaranteed accurate (this is probably the same as the secondhand knowledge case -- the data would overlap, at least). Noted as early as 1985. 3) to introduce an exaggeration -- the extreme of 2 -- guaranteed in accurate but for effect. The article is in The Journal of Semantics, but I have neithr title nor date to hand.
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. |