<<
"Only if {selcmi} can mean {se cmima be zi'o}". The empty
set is definitely not a se cmima. However, it might well
be a selcmi.
>>
Only if {selcmi} by itself is genuinely a lujvo and thus open to a new reading altogether. Several reasons have been given agains this view. This is the first vaguely convincing case in its favor.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.