Re: [lojban] Re: sticky hypothesis

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 9/29/2002 2:51:20 PM Central Daylight Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes:

<<

No it doesn't.  It doesn't attach the ki to the da'i.  I was trying
to find a way to do that using fi'o and such, but it doesn't work,
the KI gets read into a rule for simple-tense-modal which is nothing but
a KI.  So "ki" standing alone is in fact a term.

>>
I've got to stop trusting these parsers!  But, OK, it is a tense now set under the {da'i}.  The effect is still what is wanted: we stay at that place until released.  So, I suppose we do need {ki} again to get out -- probably {ki da'inai} to look good.





To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.