<<
Also I think saying "lo nazbi be mi" is more or less wrong. If.
you're talking about your nose, you must know it, so you really
should say "le nazbi be mi". Same thing as the du'u stuff. The
"a nose of mine" reading is much more like "lo nazbi" than "le
nazbi". The inner ro on "le" does *not* imply I have multiple
noses. But using "lo" insead of "le" would imply I'm not sure
which thing is my nose
>>
Errh. Isn't the assumed inner quantifier on {le} {su'o} and the outer {ro}?
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.