On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Robin Turner wrote:
I imagine cognitive linguists would also find it interesting from the
point of metaphor. Lojban combines the explicit metaphor-making of
lujvo (which are not metaphorical in the common sense of the word, but
are in the cogling sense) with an attempt to suppress unmarked metaphor
(which to a mainstream cognitive linguist would be quixotic but
interesting).
Can you explain more about what Lojban is doing that seems quixotic to
linguists? Thanks!
One thing to bear in mind in these discussions is that terms like
"cognitive linguist" or "Chomskyan" are very vague (zo'o family
resemblance categories?); this is why I qualified it by saying (le'e)
"mainstream cognitive linguist"!