Lojbab:
As for the question of errors, if it violates the baseline, then by
definition it IS an error, assuming that the baseline has any meaning
whatsoever.
It is not an error if witting and deliberate. We don't say that, say,
the language of Finnegans Wake errs, even if it is ungrammatical.
So it sounds like you are explicitly advocating public dialectization of
the language even on issues where there is a clear baseline position if you
think that position to be wrong, which sounds like out-and-out rejection
that the baseline has any meaning?
He wasn't, but it is the only solution.
Dialectisation the only solution? zo'o Given the size of the Lojban
user base, I think dialectisation would result in Lojban testing not the
Sapir-whorf hypothesis, but Wittgenstein's argument against the
possibility of private languages.