[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:05:33PM -0500, Craig wrote:
> >>> McIvor is not on the BPFK, is he? Why not invite him?
> >>
> >> Bob expressly wants to invite him. I didn't, and if he is invited,
> >> as far as I'm concerned, he's invited as a Lojbanist (or at the
> >> least, as someone with expertise in Logical Language), not as a
> >> Loglanist.
>
> >I received an informal invitation to participate, but having read all
> >the correspondence to this point, I see no point in doing so.
>
> I must say, I am extremely dissappointed. Not that anyone chooses not
> to be on the bypyfyk, but that we have driven away a person who has
> expressed some interest in the language.
He's explicitely declared that he has no interest in learning the
vocabulary of lojban. What definition of 'interest in the language' are
you using?
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi