Re: [lojban] Re: let's get rid of this lojban == loglan crap (was Re: tags)

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:30PM +0200, robin wrote:
> Adam Raizen wrote:
> >la djorden. cusku di'e
> >
> >>I'm not a LLG member, so I can't official propose this for the next
> >>meeting (afaik).  However, as a member of the community I would like
> >>to ask that at the next LLG meeting the "lojban is loglan" statement
> >>be considered for revokation.
> >
> >
> >There was a very difficult and expensive legal battle fought over
> >this, and those who participated in it would probably not want their
> >effort to be nullified, and historically Lojban is related to Loglan,
> >so at least for those reasons it would probably be difficult to
> >straight-out revoke the "lojban is loglan" statement. I think that a
> >clarification is in order, though.
> >
> 
> How about something like "Lojban is a variant of Loglan".  Or
> "development" or whatever.

Sounds good to me.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/    ***    I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/   ***   to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi