Re: [lojban] Re: tags

[Steven Belknap <sbelknap@uic.edu>]

On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 02:28  PM, John Cowan wrote:

> Steven Belknap scripsit:
>
> > What explains
> > the insertion of the phrase "lojban is Loglan" in lojban official
> > policy? (I am aware of the history of this phrase, I am asking whether
> > there is a deeper explanation than the historical animus of that legal
> > battle.)
> As the person who proposed that language at an LLG meeting long ago, I 
> will
> say that it was primarily a reaction to JCB's "Lojban is not/is a 
> knockoff of
> Loglan".
>
> Today I might make it "Lojban is a Loglan".
I like that better.

-Steven