Re: [lojban] Re: let's get rid of this lojban == loglan crap (was Re: tags)

[Steven Belknap <sbelknap@uic.edu>]

On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:59  PM, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > > > There was a very difficult and expensive legal battle fought over
> > > > this, and those who participated in it would probably not want their
> > > > effort to be nullified, and historically Lojban is related to 
> > > > Loglan,
> > > > so at least for those reasons it would probably be difficult to
> > > > straight-out revoke the "lojban is loglan" statement. I think that a
> > > > clarification is in order, though.
> > > How about something like "Lojban is a variant of Loglan".  Or
> > > "development" or whatever.
> > Sounds good to me.
>
>
> Or that Lojban is a language in the Lojban family.
If you mean, "Lojban is a language in the Loglan family." That would be 
OK with me.

-Steven