On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:18:55PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 02:21:58PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
[...]
> > > What can I say? It's wrong. Using da to mean something that you have in
> > > mind would make da specific. And it would make lo specific. But lo is not
> > > specific. I think even Jordan would agree with this; he once tried to
> > > convince me that even when da was limited to refer to a single item, it
> > > STILL isn't specific!
> >
> > I agree with robin, except for his terminology. It's specific under
> > the way you are saying specific, but it is not +specific in the way
> > that "le" is.
> >
> > So. "da viska mi" means "there is something which sees me". And
> > even if the speaker knows *which* thing sees them, they can still
> > make this nonspecific claim.
> >
> > How can you tell it is nonspecific? Because a legitimate response
> > to "Something sees me" is "Yeah, but *what* sees you?". If I had
> > instead said "the dog sees me", you cannot respond that way, because
> > I just told you (instead you would have to say "which dog sees you"
> > (or {le ki'a gerku})).
>
>
> This is still a second claim that's being made, different from the first
> claim. So it is nonetheless true that the *statement* mi nitcu lo mikce
> ranges over every doctor, even if the asker later modifies the claim and
> reduces the subset.
>
> The original claim is falsified by the rejection of a single doctor.
>
> So, while mi nitcu da could refer to a state of needing something more
> specific than {any thing}, that's not what THIS claim says. And da emerges
> as {any thing} once more.
Ok. Xod, do you reject or agree that "mi djica lo mikce" is the
same logically as "Ex(Mx & Dmx)". If you reject, then obviously
we shouldn't continue discussing this. If you agree, then let's
talk about the logical formula and ignore Lojban so that this can
be more quickly settled.
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00405.pgp
Description: PGP signature