Re: [lojban] Re: spofu skami

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:12:17PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:57:03AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > > It is part of the basic definition. The definition is not "nerve";
> > > that's a logflash mnemonic.
> >
> > x1 is a nerve/neuron [body-part] of x2
> >
> > Note the words 'nerve', 'neuron', and 'body-part'.  Perhaps you're
> > talking about a different definition?
> 
> You know what I'm talking about. Pretend I've explained myself.

Umm, no, I don't.  IIRC we've discussed this before, and I threw my
hands up in frustration because I couldn't understand what the hell you
were trying to say.

The x1 of nirna is clearly a neuron.  The x2 is the body containing the neuron.
I have no idea how one could possibly have any reasonable argument against that
point.

Here's the full definition:

 nirna nir          nerve
                    x1 is a nerve/neuron [body-part] of x2; [metaphor:
                    information/control network connection]

                    [also (adjective:) x1 is neural]; (cf. ve benji)

Note the cf. to "ve benji", which seems like it might do what you want.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/    ***    I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/   ***   to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi