Craig wrote: >>".y" is in selma'o Y, not UI - can it really be negated? > > > Y shouldn't be negatable. Y is not negatable in actual usage. The Book does > not mention Y being negatable. Jbofi'e thinks Y is negatable. Jordan tells > me that the BNF disagrees. Hrm, looks like Y is not negatable.
If I remember rightly, the CLL is always right, unless it contradicts the YACC grammar. The YACC grammar is always right unless it contradicts the BNF grammar. All hail to the BNF.
-- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org