On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:14:45PM +1000, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> Is the proper venue for technical discussion of Lojban the main lojban list?
>
> No.
>
> Then why the hell is this list being flooded with technical
> discussion of Lojban? That is *why* jboske was created. And jboske
> was not created exclusively for tinkering discussions. Anyone who
> claims so is lying. Anyone who wants to discuss technical details of
> Lojban (of which this clearly is an instance), but refuses to read
> jboske and wants to use this list instead, is being ornery.
Well. I don't actually *know* why jboske was created. But it is
certainly true that a lot of what could be called "tinkering
discussions" take place there (And just posted a "screw the BNF"
message a day or two ago, for example).
But that's nonimportant; I agree that it is better to seperate
open-ended technical discussion from the main list, and that's what
jboske has become primarily for, now.
[...]
> Meanwhile, if you want to harangue each other about whether UI=NAI is
> a good thing or not, before the formal presentation on phpbb, then
> take it to jboske. FFS.
[...]
Agreed. Too bad I didn't read your message before sending replies.
Future replies from me will go to jboske.
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00469.pgp
Description: PGP signature