Re: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one.

[And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>]

> Should any BPFK-sponsored publication (such as a supplement to CLL) 
> mention Latin-based alt orthographies? Or the other ones? My 
> suspicion is no; anyone have strong feelings on the subject?

pe'i BPFK should put forward the motion that any orthography that
corresponds unambiguously to the official one should be deemed to
fall within prescription-conformant usage. Many people have strong
feelings about the official orthography -- some people loathe it, others
loathe any deviation from it. I think that these sorts of battles should
be negotiated through usage.

--And.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/uetFAA/GSaulB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/