Re: [lojban] Re: emotions

[Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>]

At 02:13 PM 5/26/03 +0000, jjllambias2000 wrote:
>la lojbab cusku di'e
> > >In any case, the best way to oppose these words is to provide
> > >good canonical alternatives, as Nick said.
> >
> > Nora suggested that no noncanonical word should be allowed to be
>added to
> > the jbovlaste UNLESS a canonical (perhaps longer) alternative has
>already
> > been added.
>
>That seems to put the onus on the wrong party. If I wanted
>{parji} to be adopted then I'd be tempted to enter an unappealing
>canonical alternative so that it won't really compete with my
>proposal.

One would hope that people would abide by the spirit of the rule, and not 
play such games.

lojbab

-- 
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/GSaulB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/