On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:45:28AM -0700, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> --- tk1@despammed.com wrote:
> > [Jorge Llamb?as:]
> > > i ua le cmalu krokodilo
> > > cu zengau le ky rebla
> > > si'u le djacu pe la nilos
> > > le ka camri'ojvebla
> > [...]
> >
> > I am thinking of replacing the last two words with e.g. "solji skapi"...
> > which still leaves two syllables for random interjections.
>
> But it won't rhyme with rebla...
>
> > forall x (nanmu(x) <=> (remna(x) /\ exists y exists z nakni(x, y, z)))
> >
> > (Ah! I think I got it.) I tried reading up Chapter 16 of the Reference
> > Grammar to see how to put the above into Lojban, but apparently the material
> > is incomplete -- there is no mention on how to group subexpressions, what
> > scopes quantifiers have, etc.
>
> That would be something like:
>
> ro da zo'u go da nanmu gi ge da remna gi su'o de su'o di zo'u da de di nakni
Why are you guys so verbose? :)
{ro da go nanmu gi remna gi'e nakni} is exactly the same as both
of the lojbo-ified versions of the formula so far.
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00491.pgp
Description: PGP signature