[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] le pareremo'o selsa'a
Pierre Abbat wrote:
>On Sunday 01 June 2003 22:03, sshiskom wrote:
>
>
>>le pareremo'o selsa'a
>>
>>.i la'e lu .e'u fe lo zdani be lo cevni cu klama li'u
>>mi selgei
>>
>>
>
>.i mi gleki le nu mi te cusku lu .e'u mi klama le jegvo bo zdani li'u
>God's name is used here, so the translation should say {jegvo} or {iaves}.
>{mi} should be {mi'o} or {ma'a}, but that wouldn't scan.
>
I find Pierre's reading easier to follow, and also similar in structure
to the original.
>>.i doi ierusalem.
>>mi'a ne'i lo do bitmu cu zvati
>>
>>
>
>The original is "`omdim hayu ragleinu bsha`areikh". In Lojban, lo jamfu sanli
>naje te sanli, and I'm not sure what to do with "inside your gates". I didn't
>even know that Hebrew had a progressive tense; I thought it was peculiar to
>Aramaic.
>
It's "`omdOT hayu ragleinu". Legs are feminine (one of the few decent
rules for gender in Hebrew: if it's on your body, and you have more than
one of it, it's feminine).
The tense is currently called "present tense" but it's really a
participle (can be used as a noun or adjective) and has an imperfective
meaning. I always understood the verse to be metaphorical, that our
legs were *standing* (upright/proud/etc) while in your gates. *If* you
want to have that meaning (and I'm not saying you should), there's
always .o'a. If the emphasis is there, again, one could have lo jamfu
cu sanli.
>>.i do selzba gi'e denmi je tcadu
>>
>>.i loi natmi po'u loi jegvo je natmi
>>mu'i le nu jarco le nu ckire lo cmene be lo cevni
>>ku ku ku ku
>>ja'i le tcaci tu klama
>>
>>
>
>I can't hear {ku ku ku ku} without thinking of the birds: lenu punji le sovda
>be lo'e cipnrkuku kukuku zvati le zdani be lo'e na'e cipnrkuku kuku.
>
I have a lot of trouble following the Lojban, while the Hebrew isn't
that complex. Well, okay, it may be somewhat obscure in meaning, but
the grammar isn't hard. I'm not sure either what to make of
"yerushalayim hab'nuyah k'`ir shechubrah lahh yachdav"; something like
"Jerusalem the built-up is like a city that is all knit together." I
would take "b'nuyah" to be more an adjective than part of the main
predicate. (And why the switch to second person, btw?) Something like
"la .ierucaLYiim. (n/p)oi jai vi dinju..." maybe? (noi or poi is
another question of interpretation. As a prayer in exile, "poi" makes
more sense. As a song of praise at the time, "noi")
>If you'd like to contribute to the Bible translation, ask Robin Lee Powell for
>a cvs account. I haven't done anything with it in a long time, and if you do,
>that'll encourage me to get back into it. The English version in the cvs is
>Douay, but don't let that bind you. Douay calls that psalm 121.
>
There are some small differences in numbering (esp. of verses) among
versions of the Bible. In Jewish tradition, it's #122. (oh... there's
also the "song of ascents, of David" verse at the beginning that should
be included).
~mark
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/GSaulB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/