Re: [lojban] Re: [please read] survey of lojbanists

[Gregory Dyke <gregory.dyke@epfl.ch>]

Invent Yourself wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Evgeni Sklyanin wrote:
>
>  
>
> > --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Gregory Dyke <lojban-out@l...> wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > coi rodo i doi ba'erodo
> > >
> > > i ti jai cipra leka se bangu la lojban kei rodo
> > >
> > > i ko spuda mrilu mi po'o fau lenu do tcidu je jimpe ti
> > >
> > > mu'o mi'e greg
> > > --
> > >      
> > coi greg.
> >
> > mi ba'o tcidu le se mrilu be do .i mi jimpe le se cusku
> > .i ku'i mi na jimpe le te pilno be zo jai
> >    
>
>
> nitcu zo jai ki'u le du'u lo cipra cu na'e dacti jeke pruce najo fasnu .i
> gerna panra lu tu'a ti cipra li'u ni'o sa'ecai zo ti naldrani ki'u le du'u
> noda fatci stuzi lo selsku
>
>
>  
Yeah, quite a few people complimented me on my ti and the jai that goes 
with it. I'm sorry about those I didn't answer... It probably should 
have been dei, but I stand by jai. (tu'a would have been ok as well)

I'm sorry for not answering in lojban: although my recognition is 
getting better, my recall is still sketchy and I can't really write 
stuff without wordlists. It is really cool to be able to read 300 
caracters of solid lojban without really having to do an intermediate 
translation into English.

I'm surprised only one person picked out the fact that the x2 of mrilu 
is not the recipient. In particular, Evgeni knows tha the x2 is the 
mail, as indicated by his use of le se mrilu and yet the incorrect place 
structure didn't bother him enough for hime to point it out.

for those of you who still haven't responded, mail me privately: epfl 
att lojban ddott org

Greg