Re: [lojban] Re: Emily Dickinson

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

--- And Rosta <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk> wrote:
> greg:
> > > > > se xabju lo flira na mulno
> > > > > se viska lo trina poi ka'e
> > 
> > Does that na parse?
> 
> I believe so.
>  
> > isn't lo brode na broda == lo brode cu na broda == naku lo brode cu 
> > broda?
> 
> No, unless as is very possible, I have misread the grammar.

I'm afraid you have misread it. {na} can only appear in front
of the whole selbri, possibly mixed with tags. It can't appear
inside of a tanru.

You can fix the poem by changing {na mulno} to {narmulno}. In any
case you didn't want na to have scope over more than mulno.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com