Re: [lojban] Re: le du

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

And Rosta scripsit:

> > Seems to me that it should probably default to su'obu'a, like da
> > defaults to su'oda.
> 
> If that were the case, then {le bu'a} would suffice as a descriptionless
> referential expression, but would have the drawback of introducing
> communicatively redundant quantification with all its attendant
> difficulties.

The intent is that bu'a, like da, when not bound in an explicit prenex,
is bound with su'o in an implicit prenex that is as close as it could be.

-- 
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan      jcowan@reutershealth.com
Be yourself.  Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where
no such knowledge exists.  Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in
the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup,
James Clark is as perennial as the grass.  --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free shipping on all inkjet cartridge & refill kit orders to US & Canada. Low prices up to 80% off. We have your brand: HP, Epson, Lexmark & more.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5510
http://us.click.yahoo.com/GHXcIA/n.WGAA/ySSFAA/GSaulB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/