Re: [lojban] Re: {Archivist} Intention of gunma?

[Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>]

At 01:22 PM 10/16/03 -0700, Robin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:50:54PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> > At 04:39 PM 10/15/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > The "intent" (however sloppy) was
> >
> > le cecmu cu gunma mi joi da    (unless I am the only component of the 
> mass).
> >
> > but I believe current thinking would make it
> >
> > le cecmu cu gunma mi ce da
>
> My question was, can argument 2 be incompletely specified?

I thought I indicated not - that se pagbu would work for incompletely 
specified component lists, so we don't need gunma to be exactly the same thing.

lojbab

--
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org