Re: [lojban] Re: Another book wierdness.

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:47:10AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> 
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > 15.7)  mi ce'e bau la lojban. pe'e joi do ce'e bau la gliban.
> > nu'u casnu
> >     ( I [plus] in-language Lojban massed-with you [plus]
> >     in-language English) discuss.
> > 
> > My version of the official parser doesn't handle pe'e or ce'e,
> > however it seems Amazingly Unlikely that the sentence is correct
> > in any sense, as it uses nu'u to terminate ce'e/pe'e, which the
> > grammar does not allow that I can see.
> 
> The sentence is correct without nu'u.

Wow.  You seem to actually understand termsets!  I think you're the
only one.

Given that the book is broken WRT the grammar in two of the major
examples, I suppose this isn't too surprising.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies."  -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui