Re: [lojban] Re: Another book wierdness.

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

--- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:49:44AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > 
> > --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:18:12AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > > >     nu'i ge mi lo nu cusku bau nu'u gi do da nelci
> > > 
> > > Yep, that's the case where my new version has nu'u being
> > > absolutely required.
> > > 
> > > Any other cases?  I couldn't find any.
> > 
> > How about this:
> > 
> >   nu nu'i da lo broda nu'u brode kei 
> 
> That's because if you remove the kei, you're still in the nu'i when
> you try to close the nu, right?

Not sure what you mean. The problem is that if you remove the nu'u,
you don't have an inside selbri for the nu, and so you can't close it
with kei yet.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html