[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: Official parser problem?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:19:08AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2004 00:26, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > My goal is to produce a completely formalized grammar for Lojban
> > (*including* the morphology) that has no pre-processor at all[2] and
> > encodes something close enough to the current grammar as to
> > invalidate no existing usage.
>
> I have 144KB of morphology test cases, including some corner cases
> (e.g. {micytosmabru} vs. {mictosmarbu}). Would you like it now, or can
> you wait for the next valfendi release?
I would like to wait. Remind me again if necessary. Thank you.
-Robin
--
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui