[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Official parser problem?



On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:19:08AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2004 00:26, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > My goal is to produce a completely formalized grammar for Lojban
> > (*including* the morphology) that has no pre-processor at all[2] and
> > encodes something close enough to the current grammar as to
> > invalidate no existing usage.
> 
> I have 144KB of morphology test cases, including some corner cases
> (e.g. {micytosmabru} vs. {mictosmarbu}). Would you like it now, or can
> you wait for the next valfendi release? 

I would like to wait.  Remind me again if necessary.  Thank you.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies."  -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui