Re: [lojban] Re: Error in bnf.300

[Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>]

At 11:54 AM 3/21/04 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>But the "I jek" has already been eaten, so the appropriate parte of
>paragraph can't match.  Oops, nowhere to go.  Oh well.
>
>(I know this occurs because I just watched my PEG parser do it several
>times until I changed the ordering; it's fixed now, and is the only
>Lojban parser I'm aware of that can parse "mi broda .i je bo no da zo'u
>broda").

It prescriptively shouldn't be able to.  Under TECHFIX 45, the ability to 
put an unmarked prenex after an IJEK was specifically and intentionally 
removed.  It formerly had been able to do so, so the change was made 
because Cowan (and others) were convinced that it was wrong to allow this.


-- 
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org




To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/