[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Robin Confused (was Re: Re: "pu" versus "pu ku" and LR(1))



At 10:19 PM 4/8/04 -0400, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote:
>Bob LeChevalier scripsit:
> > I'm afraid of loosening the rules too much if not necessary, for fear we
> > will end up with something like the PA string situation and the UI string
> > situation where everything is grammatical but interpretation is 
> potentially
> > a nightmare.
>
>The trouble is that we're already there.  Since any string of tense
>cmavo can be made grammatical in term_83 context by inserting judicious
>ku's, which the parser will cheerfully do, all the effort put into
>simple_tense_modal_972 and its children was basically pointless.

The rules are still useful for sumti tcita and in theory all tense 
constructs should be semantically equivalent to some sumti tcita construct.

> > The X-ku Y-ku
> > breakup at least gives an interpretation for odd strings, even if it may
> > not be the one people would like.
>
>No, it just pushes the interpretation question off on what it means to have
>multiple tense-ku's in a bridi.  Nothing changes, really.  Does puku ze'aku
>mean the same as puze'a, for instance?  Nobody knows.

puze'a means  "pu da ku ze'a de ku" appropriately places in the sentence 
for some values of da and de.  I thought you had explicitly defined things 
this way in the red book.

>Tentatively, I would favor a loosening of the grammar (this is a real byfy
>change) whereby arbitrary sequences of tense cmavo are permitted in any
>context, but only the existing permitted sequences have standard 
>interpretations.
>This would preserve most of the Red Book, and would only require a notation
>that tense-cmavo sequences other than the known ones do not yet have defined
>meanings.

That's the game we played with PA, as I understand it, and now we have 
debates over the meaning of some of those undefined strings.

lojbab

-- 
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GSaulB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/