Re: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 07:05:26PM -0400, Nora LeChevalier wrote:
> At 03:51 PM 5/13/04 -0700, Robin wrote:
> >I'm inclined to agree, but his point (at least currently; it's
> >evolved over the last few hours) is that "ybu" would be a *single*
> >word.
> 
> But that "single" word invalidates all the documentation on cmavo word
> forms.  Cmavo currently can only be either a series of vowels or a
> single consonant followed by a series of vowels (where "series of
> vowels" is  a little up in the air as to what's acceptable).

Point.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi